Get in touch with Talite Transformer Co., Ltd Company

Contact Form 使用中

FAT & Document Pack Evidence Scorecard

Transformer Supplier Evidence Scorecard | Talite Transformer
Talite Transformer Buyer Tool

FAT & Document Pack Evidence Scorecard

Rate what a supplier has actually provided, not what the proposal says will be available later. Use the open items as a clarification list before commercial alignment.

Evaluation Criteria

Evidence criterion Observed status
01

Controlled technical schedule

Project values, assumptions, deviations and revision status are traceable.

02

Standards and jurisdiction map

Applicable editions, purchaser rules and local conformity boundaries are stated.

03

Design calculations

Requested calculations and approval milestones are identified.

04

Guaranteed losses and tolerances

Loss basis, measurement point and contractual treatment are explicit.

05

FAT procedure and witness plan

Tests, sequence, hold points, notice periods and acceptance rules are listed.

06

Certified test reports

Report content, format, sign-off and exception handling are defined.

07

Drawings and interface records

Outline, terminals, accessories, civil loads and connection details are covered.

08

Transport and site handling plan

Shipping split, route limits, preservation and receipt checks are addressed.

09

Installation and commissioning boundary

Supplier, contractor and owner responsibilities are separated.

10

Warranty and service evidence

Start point, exclusions, response route and spare-parts scope are reviewable.

Evidence Completeness
0/40
Evidence not entered

Clarification Focus

Score each row using the evidence currently available to the buyer team.

10 areas unscored
Review Evidence Package

Scoring Methodology

0

No evidence supplied

1

Claim or promise only

2

Partial evidence with open gaps

3

Reviewable project evidence

4

Controlled & contract-ready evidence

A low score creates a clarification task, not an automatic supplier rejection. Buyer teams should attach each score to the evidence revision they reviewed. Technical acceptance remains separate from document completeness.

Note: This score describes document completeness, not transformer quality, supplier capability or technical compliance. The purchaser remains responsible for qualification, design review and contractual acceptance.